Bernice Richards is clever...
These people I complain about all are...
I am sure of it...
There is a reason they purport to forget facts...
When they are presented, and logical conclusions put forth...
And use "collectivity" to justify these "crimes"...
They know the conclusion it leads to...
Helping me...
Hurting them...
Even though it would be justice you see...
And they swear no malice...
Only forgetfullness on their part...
But, you know, the results are doubtlessly malicious.

Here is the sort of thing Bernice & Edward Richards say:

"You wanted to see (this doctor) initially." So this is supposed to mean I guess that I have "flip flopped," which, I suppose, they think has some relevance on whether or not they were right initially.
Well, if you consider my full position, and the pressure they put me under it is quite understandable... You can see how illogical they are... so I figured a doctor, a specialist, etc. would not lie, would stick to the facts in a straightforward way... unlike them... but no, it's not necessarily the case, unfortunately. So, I was put in a position where they were dragooning me, by dint of their initial refusal to fail to presume, and to give me the basic respect any human being deserves (forget all the many indications that I was intellectually superior to them)... where I was grappling blindly for "back-up." I had some, and the medical issues were not that complex... actually, in my opinion. Nothing was really that complex, but to insane people like them, to make things complex is advantageous: here is the example: "It is not proven, but it is 'more than likely.'" So that is how they break the law, and these filthy judges and doctors go along with it. It's the 'ole switcharoo' pure and simple: "Proven" & "More than likely..." Then I am getting in to the debate, because they've sucked me into it, about the fact that "more than likely" is totally subjective, again, because they substituted subjectivity into a legal, ethical, and logical rubric where it never belonged, and where any decent, ethical, intelligent and rational person understands only objectivity belongs... but that's the sort of fools they are... and if they want to abuse someone, that's how they do it, and that's how others manage to retain their positions, wealth, freedom etc. (when they shouldn't) after facilitating this. It's fucking vile, in short. They're retards, who due to that can not escape Hell, and their reality (nb. not "the reality") is what they inflict on others, specifically yours truly.

Motherfuckers in the Name of Motherfuckers

    The heat is on... Thinking today that, honestly, cab drivers do give the police a bad name. Actually, I was first thinking that yesterday, to be completely honest. I find that it is simply plain filthy what I happen to notice going on. For example, some cab driver will "near-clip" you, and then when you flick the guy off, he is like "Hatred for Mushlims." Now, this is an all too common reality, again, so I observe. Secondly, my theory on that is bolstered by my ideas relating to the ability for people to commit vehicular homicide, which is facilitated not only by the size and power of the vehicles, but I am arguing, also, by the general fog of air pollution and the effect this has on persons' ability to judge situations accurately, to maintain calm and control their own emotions, and to have full coordination.
    Don't get me wrong, I do feel bad for a person that strikes a bicycles and kills of paralyzes, or maims them, but, on the other hand, I don't feel bad for the part of human nature that allows this, which chalks such occasional "incidents" up to "necessary evil" etc. when, for all I know, it's actually the most unnecessary evil imaginable. Thirdly, I am extremely resistant, given the reality of what I observe on the ground having to do with cab-driver misconduct, and it's commonality, to the idea of enrolling Muslims in the police force... but what can you do? It's quite the debaucle isn't it. People will become citizens. We can see how they may be assimilated without fully meeting the requirements, of a population which self-identifies as such, for observing general codes of moral conduct, or "unspoken rules," which, again, may truly be all-important (and I am of the opinion that they are).
   We have "freedom of religion" which is great, but let us not allow it to breed ignorance, or ignoring some extant thing, ie. what religions are. We don't have to claim we fully understand the religions, or the groups of believers. We don't have to  Now, for example, look at the situation Catholics face; they simply can not ignore the priest-sexual-abuse scandal... at the very least, they must admit that a not-insignificant portion of the population of Catholics was not "all knowing" and somewhat impotent to stop such a horrible scandal as that has been. Similarly, the Muslim population, clearly, needs to be, not only cognizant,. but truly fully aware of what their brothers the terrorist are doing to everyone else, not just non-Muslims, ie. they need to understand they are being hurt, not helped by such actions of mass murder as the various bombings that we have seen, et. al.
    Now, air pollution is much more a problem than people realize. That's another thing I have to assert. I'm not saying that a lot of people don't enjoy, wallowing in it, or, additionally, nor am I saying that anyone who enjoys life at all enjoys the havoc and filth and damage to person's physical health that air pollution will cause, really, in all but the slightest quantities.
   Anyway, I do believe that really the fact that if I was struck and killed, or even murdered (we wouldn't be sure, now would we?... 'chances are that it's not murder' right?) by a cab driver... this person WOULD NEVER BE PUT TO DEATH... I think that's somewhat unfair. Does it mean they are not going to hit me if they'll be put to death... obviously not... we are told by suicide bombers that they'll still kill us. Does it mean if we eject cab drivers from our streets that I'll be safe then from anyone attacking me and killing me? Hell no, I do not I believe that! However, I do believe that their should be, really, fair punishment for misdeeds such as vehicular homicide or manslaughter. I don't believe in the justice system, necessarily, so I think it shouldn't be up to anyone to decide whether it was a homicide (purposeful) or an accident (manslaughter)... Hence, people should know... you are at fault... I know the counter-argument is that "if I am just bicycling poorly... then people are just doing what is necessary, for them, by driving... I am the asshole." I know that counter-argument well, but then What IF... I am only bicycling poorly because it's nearly impossible to bicycle because the air is so bad... Trust me, I am not worried about being hit by a meteorite while outside. Sure, it could happen, but I am not worried about that. I am worried about the pollution that I get from being outside, and Rob Ford will hate me for it, but I think a lot of that has to do with unnecessary vehicular use, plain and simple. Sure, I want to focus on all kinds of ways of reducing pollution, but that is simply an impossible hurdle... they car industry and its fruits.

And Now we have Twitter Blocking

Once again, working at all hours, Twitter, is to block the truth. To protect some of the nastiest devils on Earth, and they will be looking to, with their friends in positions of power, obfuscate the truth, and eliminate foes, whether right or wrong, because that's what these people do, and I was making some very good points about certain people, ie. Duncan Delano, and how it is clear not only what the guy's character consists of, but how he is very much, if not totally akin to a gang member, and how he is clearly the sort of person that would poison someone simply for "insulting" him by speaking the truth of what was said, and now, Twitter has blocked from other persons' sight, and even stolen from me my own work, which, is important, not only to me, but to other people, and it is, of course, a form of misrepresentation. You can see why these people need to run Twitter, because it shows how corrupt they are, and the legal system alone, with a fair and just Twitter would not accomplish whatever nefarious goals they may have for their selves. Like I was saying, though, if people could read my twitter feed, they would see much about this country, how the "lone wolves" are those running it, or are people who are in favour of them, and how simply, if people like Duncan Delano are scrutinized, and, due to their character, or lack thereof, jailed.. honestly, that this country is bound to become utterly corrupt, I mean, far more corrupt than it already seems to be, to one who can analyze current events with a keen eye to detail, and that, also, goes for the likes of Jason Goldman, apparently, or so it seems. Addendum: Also, of course, people would try to control this just like they try to control the press, or the judicial system, because we don't have a democracy, but a controlled democracy, and it is like anarchy, but not a controlled anarchy, it's a stolen anarchy.

Look At It This Way

First, find someone who is credited by others with taking care of you to taunt you, and disrespect your opinions, and never hear you out, seeming not to care whether you are a liar or an honest person.

Also, have a professor in your graduate program accuse you of threatening you life, another student named Isaac, say you've "called for blood" randomly, after this professor had made bizarre offhand comments to the class, before failing you, and after the government affiliated school's administration failed to inquire into the issue of whether the professor's behaviour had been abusive.

Have them chase you out of the only place you have to live, with the assistance of a friend of theirs, who will just slander you without a lot of reason.

Get tazed by police officers.

Get brought to a place that much resembles a prison, where you will not be allowed to leave from.

Find that when you write to protest the events to your friends, everyone one of them, if they didn't resent you, at best, was a fair-weather friend who didn't care to hear you out as the people who were supposed to be caring towards you didn't.

Get forced to take tablets that you have reason to believe will harm you, as you are being prevented from taking measures that you have reason to believe will help you, under threat of being injected.

Then, out of concern for your health, be forced to flee the area, when you are finally able to, after celebrating New Years, your 20th birthday etc. in this hideous fascist-run cesspool located in Concord, NH, and, seek help from people who are reluctant to help you, and, in some cases, bitter because you tried to help them find a good place to live affordably, in the past, and they found it to be inadequate.

Then, use up the last of your money. Already, resembling a homeless person, try to sell some artwork from the sidewalk in a heavily polluted, although highly trafficked area.

Almost end up on the street when you run out of money.

After stressing the lack of money, fruitlessly searching for a job, without a home, any capital, or a great condition of health, during one of the worst recessions of modern history.

Remember, how in the first week of architecture school, it was abundantly clear that your spacial imaging capabilities were a head above even the second most intelligent person in your class of 15, or so, and laugh, or maybe cry, at what's become of you.

Call your mother and have her cry, not because you are being denied the ability to try a very logically derived strategy to recover your health for lack of money, when your parents have assets worth millions, but because you don't think she, and her sister, her husband et. al. are smarter than you, although you are known to be in the %95 or higher where intelligence is concerned and you have no indication that any of these people truly are, or rather, both are equally intelligent as you are, and actually "give a shit" about what happens to you, or whether your basic rights are respected, while you get a fair chance to make a life for yourself.

End up living in an apartment, which it is later revealed has very bad air quality, being extremely drafty and in a polluted city, with roommates who are often not very friendly the best people you could find to live with you, while you get by on a shoe-string budget, which is less than people living in public housing have, and much less than people working minimum wage have.

Have an inability to gain simple medical tests due in part to a fear based on the precedent which has been set by the medical field of imprisoning you, and forcing drugs into your system BEFORE PROVING what they say about you is true.

You are in a bad apartment, have access to worse food, worse air, and more impure treatment (zinc) than you would have otherwise, and accidentally take to much zinc.

Realize it, get off the zinc completely to try to recover your blood counts, end up getting much sicker than you were before when you were copper deficient.

Go to the closest hospital, reachable by public transportation, thinking it will be made clear that the horrible sickness you incurred was due to copper overdosing, only for them to blame it all on your taking zinc, ignoring the fact that you admit you've made a mistake, saying you will definitely not do anything differently, and obviously failing to consider that maybe some a reduction in familial abuse would help, never mind a chance to get your life in order and pursue the things you have a talent to pursue without having people try to drug and sterilize you.

You never needed the hospital to tell you your blood counts were low, as you already knew that, but to emphasize how important they are there, they insist you be kept on because your blood counts are low, and again, the only way to stop this is through psychiatric drugs, such as risperdal/one.

Be put in a room with a man with both Alzheimers disease and a colostomy bag, arguably  among the worst possible scenarios for someone specifically recovering from a low blood count...

Be brought to court several times. Have the judges disrespect completely the logic of your arguments. Be proverbially slapped in the face by one judge who already knows your case is worthless, and a useless formality, according to him, before he awards the "decision" to the physician who in this second case, failed to bring his medical students to "teach them" because it was so obvious that the man was lying through his teeth in order to secure a hospitalization and ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL rights to medicate the person.

Only get released from that in order to be transferred back to NH in order to attend the wedding of your sister to a man, another "lawyer" who came on the scene just before these processes of hospitalizing you began, someone who seems  to have no objections, and therefore to be a real dirtbag, another such person, that is.

Have the surrogate guardian, a stand-in who only does your, as we noted, abusive father's wishes, ask that you be kept under lock and key for the rest of your life, so you can not escape the drugging.

(Remember, my "delusion" which allowed all these judicially, government-approved crimes to take place, was that I could determine something which might be otherwise undetectable, or recognizable, for various reason, which could be explained, and were, through my own nervous system)

Thankfully, have the workers at that office of the government affiliated mental health system, deny that you were a danger worthy of being locked up for life,without ever having a fair trial, or any chance of release.

Flee the are you grew up in again, to, once more, live in a difficult situation in an apartment, while trying to recover your health, shared with people with whom you have a tenuous relationship.

Be continually harassed my this abusive father who was always stupider than you, always crueler, always more of an animal, and have to look the guy in the eye over the video camera regularly, knowing that, in your home state, he still has the ability to drug you, and imprison you, at will, although, again you've been convicted of no crime, but only accused of believing something that isn't true, although that could never have been proven.

Come to me, and tell me, these people really are all better than you, and more intelligent, and that their offspring are the ones who are going to reduce crime, and injustice in the world.

It's True, Isn't It: "Acetone is pretty nasty"?

Peter Richards	9:11 AM (36 minutes ago)
to classic-rendez.

Harvey, fwiw, I discovered this in a quick search, among other references to potential neurotoxic affects: "There is some evidence that commonly used ketones (acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, and methyl isobutyl ketone) may potentiate the toxicity of n‐hexane and other solvents, a finding that raises doubts about the widely used method of calculating mixed solvent exposures based on the additivity of exposures" (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2078137/).
"On the basis of the results, it was proposed that the 6-hr permissible exposure limits for acetone, MEK, and cyclohexanone be reduced to less than 500, 200, and 150 mg/m^3, respectively" (http://pubget.com/paper/9311545/Neurotoxicity_Associated_with_Occupational_Exposure_to_Acetone__Methyl_Ethyl_Ketone__and_Cyclohexanone).
I did this research because my gut feeling was that acetone is not benign (not to say it's necessarily very carcinogenic, nor specifically deadly).
...

John,
I don't follow your logic. This is why: the body's processes produce acetone, I would say, is a more specifically accurate statement than the human body produces acetone. That is to say, the acetone may be a by-product of metabolic processes, for example, it may be synthesized by the body from certain constituent molecules, which the body would be less able, if not unable to evacuate, in the previous state(s). Incidentally, if certain diets were to provide medical benefits while producing acetone in higher quantities (as is, apparently, the case), that may, possibly, happen in spite of, rather than due to, this acetone-producing-phenomena. Therefore, the very point you make may be interpreted to signify its toxicity, just as easily as it might be interpreted to signify it's of a benign-nature (after all, everything that is natural isn't necessarily benign). My first hand experiences do not provide for a controlled experiment (however, iirc: I sensed less noxious affects due to "Vicks," ostensibly containing naturally-derived turpentine [there are many types of turpentine, apparently], and certain "artist quality" solvents, than I did from my female family members' nail-polish-removers); hence, I would not, personally, jump to the conclusion that, in the same environments, acetone is the better choice, or, again, dare imply acetone is completely benign.

I would say: research the substances independently if you want to know more ("pick your poison"), then "follow your nose." Also, considering the chemical composition of your chosen glue(s) might be wise, as they may, later, react with solvents, or aggravate one's system when dust is created from mechanical means of removal. Finally, definitely do take some pains to use a well-ventilated area when dealing with such materials (also, use sparingly).

Peter "I don't need no stinking school" Richards

Chicago, Illinois, United States of America

On Saturday, January 5, 2013 3:21:18 PM UTC-6, John Taglia wrote:

Don et Alia,

Acetone is NOT extremely carcinogenic. Acetone probably more natural--at least to humans--than pine spirits as the human body produces acetone. 

Acetone is considered safe enough to be used routinely in cosmetics, medical compounds, and even in some food additives.  A commonly seen  around the house item with high amounts of acetone is nail polish remover. 

That said, while acetone is not a deadly toxin, in high concentrations acetone can be irritant. I would not advise drinking it.  But  the capsaicin in chili peppers is also an irritant, and I would not advise drinking a cup of Tabasco Sauce.

Also, acetone is far less than turpentine, which is toxic to the kidneys and nervous system, as well as being an irritant to skin and lungs.  Turpentine can be very dangerous for asthmatics.

Lots of "natural" compunds can be dangerous.  HCN--Prussic acid or hydrogen cyanide--can be easily refined from the pits of many fruits.

Regards,

John "Had To Use Lots of Acetone in Organic Chemistry Lab I and II" Taglia
St. Joseph, Michigan

On Friday, January 4, 2013 8:09:54 PM UTC-5, Don wrote:

Acetone is an extremely toxic carcinogen, you should avoid using it as much as possible!

Instead of acetone, use pine spirits (turpentine), which is a more natural product.  I use it as a thinner and cleaner for tubular tire glue.  A number of years ago, a review was written about the "stickiness" of different types of tubular tire glue. It turns out that tubular tire glue affects rolling resistance.  It would be good to google for this review and make up your own mind.  I remember that one of the best glues was Vittoria Mastik one so I bought a tub of this glue as a result of this review.

I still find it difficult to mount tires without getting glue on the sidewalls !!

- Don Gillies
San Diego, CA, USA

On 1/4/13 8:09 PM, Don wrote:

Acetone is an extremely toxic carcinogen, you should avoid using it as much as possible!

Instead of acetone, use pine spirits (turpentine), which is a more natural product.  I use it as a thinner and cleaner for tubular tire glue. 

Harvey:  (1) Acetone is extremely flammable, and a nasty irritant. From reviewing a random 'material safety data sheet,' I don't find indications of carcinogenicity. Of course, my random selection (Millenia Productions, 1996, via Duke Physics web site)  might have been obsolete, but similarly the environmental fact sheet of the NH Department of Environmental Services (2005) reports no evidence of carcinogenicity, at least from inhalation.

Harvey:  (2). My day job is environmental (energy efficiency in buildings, with some background in indoor air quality, too). I'm always concerned when people imply that "more natural" is necessarily better. I'd remind you that asbestos is a "natural" product, mined in very much the same form as used. Of course, don't get me started on the hype on asbestos, at least not in this forum.

A number of years ago, a review was written about the "stickiness" of different types of tubular tire glue. It turns out that tubular tire glue affects rolling resistance.  It would be good to google for this review and make up your own mind.  I remember that one of the best glues was Vittoria Mastik one so I bought a tub of this glue as a result of this review.

Harvey: (3).  I'd love to see the testing on which that conclusion was based. From work that Jim Papadopoulos did a couple of decades ago, and from simple logic, I'd surely expect that tire air pressure and sidewall stiffness would vastly overwhelm any effect of glue differences.  My mental model of glue is that it's simply a coupling agent connecting the solid rim with the solid tire wall.  I haven't been able to think of a mechanism by which it could affect rolling resistance, if properly applied (so the tire isn't sliding around, or seated wrong).

But, I could be wrong, and hope to try some of the Vittoria Mastik you recommend.

regards,

harvey sachs
mcLean va usa

What Twitter is Hiding (Painting of Martin Luther)

Please, stop with your dirty tricks _______. If persons who resemble Martin Luther are complete trash, it's nothing for any social networking site to hide.
plate 1, in between pages 22-23.
"Three Reformers: Luther - Descartes - Rousseau." Maritain, Jacques. Charles Scribner's Sons. New York: 1929.
And for good measure, Here is what Luther said, according to Maritain:
'This is what (Luther) himself, says:
Have we sinned? "Jesus Christ stoops," says Luther, "and lets the sinner jump on His back and so saves him from death and the gaoler,* that is what Christ is for." "What a consolation for pious souls to put Him on like this and wrap him in my sins, your sins, the sins of the whole universe, and consider Him thus bearing all our sins." "When you see that your sins cleave to Him, then you will be safe from sin, death and hell. Christianity is nothing but a continual exercise in feeling that you have no sin, although you sin, but that your sins are thrown on Christ. It is enough to know the Lamb who bears the sins of the world: sin cannot detach us from Him, were we to commit a thousand fornications a day or as many murders. Is not that good news if, when someone is full of sins, the Gospel comes and tells him: Have confidence and believe and henceforth your sins are remitted? Once this stop is pulled out, the sins are forgiven; there is nothing more to wait for"' (26).