In light of recent completed works. Was Kahn,, '%100 on point', working without constraints in a perfect society? Was he someone who, being a worthy person himself, elevated monuments, in a 'sub-par-prefect-society', supposedly dedicated to another, incidentally rather homely-to-gaze-upon individual (not that 'looks' are everything), sublimating the idea of monumentality by usurping the center-stage as designer/thinker? Or, is it that we have this <<<<<< to hold against the guy, poor and disadvantaged as his early years were?
No comments:
Post a Comment